Joshua Jackson continues to mourn the demise of James Van Der Beek.
Jackson gave his first public feedback about his “Dawson’s Creek” co-star’s demise when he appeared on TODAY on March 10.
“I think it hits in a variety of different ways,” he mentioned. “For me as a father now, I think the enormity of that tragedy for his family hits me in a very different way than just as a colleague. So I think the processing is is ongoing.”
Van Der Beek died in February, sparking an outpouring of grief from his “Dawson’s Creek” family, although Jackson didn’t make any feedback on the time.
“He and I shared this very amazing time … and it was formational for us,” he continued about their time on “Dawson’s Creek.”
“And I know both of us look back on that time with great fondness, but I will also say that I know that I’m really just a footnote in what he actually accomplished in his life.”
“He became what we used to just call a good man, a man of the kind of belief, the kind of faith that allowed him to face the impossible with grace, an unbelievable partner and husband,” he added.
Van Der Beek revealed in 2024 that he had been recognized with colorectal most cancers.
Jackson, 47, has partnered with the NHL and AstraZeneca as a part of the pharmaceutical firm’s Get Body Checked Against Cancer marketing campaign, which highlights the significance of getting screened for most cancers.
“People close to me have been diagnosed with cancer, and I’m at an age where I should know my own risks,” Jackson mentioned in a press release. “So, if you watched me when I was a kid and you were a kid, it’s time to talk to your doctor about getting screened.”
Van Der Beek additionally turned an advocate for most cancers screening following his analysis. He filmed a prerecorded video when he missed a “Dawson’s Creek” reunion attributable to abdomen points final September to raise money for the nonprofit F Cancer, and he was as a paid spokesperson for Guardant Health, which affords a blood test to screen for colon cancer. People with a mean danger of colon most cancers ought to begin screening at 45, in line with the American Cancer Society, whereas these with an elevated danger ought to start earlier.
“I got screened at 46,” Van Der Beek told TODAY.com in July. “I didn’t realize they had dropped it to 45. I thought I was way ahead of the game.”
“Even just the slightest little change, it could be something, but … don’t think that not having symptoms means you don’t have to get screened, especially for something that is this curable when caught early,” he added. “That’s really what I want to get across.”
