How Silicon Valley Is Turning Scientists Into Exploited Gig Workers

How Silicon Valley Is Turning Scientists Into Exploited Gig Workers

April 14, 2026

Tech elites are enriching themselves by plundering STEM establishments—and providing researchers scraps.

How Silicon Valley Is Turning Scientists Into Exploited Gig Workers
Peter Thiel and his ilk are ravenous public science.(Eva Marie Uzcategui / Getty)

Silicon Valley wouldn’t exist with out government-funded analysis. Foundational applied sciences, together with the semiconductor and the Internet, emerged from Cold War–period army analysis applications. As graduate college students at Stanford, Larry Paige and Sergey Brin relied on funding from the National Science Foundation to develop the search algorithms that may ultimately change into Google. The touchscreens and lithium-ion batteries that we now carry round all day have been likewise developed in college labs funded by authorities grants. Even generative AI—incessantly touted because the crowning achievement of the free market, upon which the destiny of the American economic system relies upon—emerged out of many years of analysis underwritten by the Department of Defense (DOD). Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel Prize winner generally known as the Godfather of AI, left his tutorial place within the United States exactly as a result of he wanted to avoid Pentagon contracts. Hinton however turned to the Canadian authorities to assist fund his lab on the University of Toronto, which ultimately produced main AI researchers for OpenAI, Google, and Meta.

Given how a lot Silicon Valley has profited from government-funded analysis over time, you would possibly count on a specific amount of reverence for the system. At the very least, even the staunchest techno-libertarian rationalists ought to acknowledge the worth in not killing their golden goose. Yet Silicon Valley elites are on the very coronary heart of the Trump administration’s devastating assault on public science funding—and, not coincidentally, have positioned themselves to revenue off the wreckage. In explicit, conservative enterprise capitalists Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen have parlayed their in depth ties with the president into an unabashed assault on universities and institutional science. In personal textual content messages leaked to The Washington Post final 12 months, Andreessen wrote that “universities are at Ground Zero of the counterattack.” He characterized Stanford and MIT as “mainly political lobbying operations fighting American innovation at this point” and vowed that universities would “pay the price” after “they declared war on 70% of the country.” Most troublingly, Andreessen called for the National Science Foundation to obtain “the bureaucratic death penalty.”

Thiel has lengthy set his sights on shifting federal analysis {dollars} from universities to personal business. In quite a few interviews, Thiel has pointed out that we’ve 100 instances as many science PhDs as we had a century in the past, but the speed of progress is about the identical. The declare itself is doubtful. He provides no clear benchmark by which to measure scientific progress, nor does he contemplate the likelihood that science has change into extra difficult after a century of development. Could or not it’s that extra paperwork, nonetheless flawed, is required to function a Large Hadron Collider as in comparison with a microscope and Bunsen burner? For Thiel, the reply is a definitive no: “The average PhD is 99% less productive than people were 100 years ago,” he concludes with unwavering confidence. But even he can not ignore the successes of Cold War analysis applications. However a lot it would ache his libertarian soul, Thiel acknowledges that DARPA—the analysis and improvement arm of the DOD—functioned effectively early on, however he has conveniently decided that it was a one-time acceleration that “came at the price of completely corrupting the institutions.”

In any case, the justifications now matter lower than the precise outcomes. Trump entered his second time period with a plan to chop federal science funding and extort distinguished universities with threats of focused finances cuts. The assaults have been orchestrated by Michael Kratsios, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who beforehand served because the chief of employees to Thiel at his enterprise capital fund. The proposed budget included funding reductions of 40 p.c for the National Institute of Health, 57 p.c for the National Science Foundation, and 24 p.c for NASA.

Current Issue


Cover of May 2026 Issue

Although Congress has since tried to roll again a few of the cuts, the administration has already inflicted monumental harm. Over 10,000 federal employees with STEM PhDs left the federal workforce final 12 months. University labs have been forced to fireplace researchers, cancel research, or simply shut down operations altogether. Some lecturers sought refuge in Europe; others retired early. An unmistakable chill has taken maintain of the scientific institution—one that may linger lengthy after the Trump presidency.

Why would tech billionaires assault a system that made them enormously rich at just about no private value? The most evident clarification is that a lot of that newly freed-up funding could be redirected to the tech business. Thiel and Andreessen place start-ups because the treatment to the supposedly bloated, inefficient scientific paperwork. They forged themselves because the true champions of science, locked in an existential battle towards pencil-pushing charlatans. If Newton have been round as we speak, the pondering goes, he could be making use of to Y Combinator and ordering swag for his B2B SaaS start-up. This grandiosity is coupled with a powerful sense of paranoia. In a 2025 interview, Andreessen described the Biden administration as being preoccupied with “the raw application of the power of the administrative state, the raw application of regulation, and then the raw arbitrary enforcement and promulgation of regulation,” concluding: “Absolutely tried to kill us.”

When Trump took energy, it was their flip to strike again. As science budgets obtained axed, portfolio corporations backed by both Thiel or Andreessen—and sometimes both—acquired billions of {dollars} in federal contracts. The administration shortly deregulated crypto and threatened to punish states that enacted “onerous and excessive laws” regarding AI. This agenda was spearheaded by Trump’s coverage advisers, together with the billionaire enterprise capitalist David Sacks, who led PayPal alongside Thiel, and Sriram Krishnan, who was beforehand a accomplice at Andreessen’s funding agency.

The assaults on science additionally created a brand new expertise pool for Silicon Valley to take advantage of: newly displaced STEM researchers. Within the AI business, executives ceaselessly cite the purpose of making fashions which might be “PhD-level experts” throughout numerous tutorial disciplines. But coaching these fashions requires precise PhD-level specialists to write down related prompts, generate coaching information, and confirm the output. How do you get somebody with a doctoral diploma in physics or math to sit down down and clear up tons of of difficult issues? One approach is to rent them, pay a aggressive wage, and supply medical health insurance. Another, maybe much less apparent, method is to kill off as most of the earlier job alternatives as doable, such that extremely credentialed researchers may be enticed to carry out mind-numbing gig work for $30 an hour.

A multibillion-dollar business emerged for exactly this operate. The two most distinguished corporations, Mercor and ScaleAI, each acquired enterprise funding from Thiel. Those early investments seemingly paid off: Mercor most not too long ago raised funds at a $10 billion valuation, whereas Meta purchased a 49 p.c stake in ScaleAI at a $29 billion valuation. This business has grown quickly by emulating the playbook Uber and Lyft used to enchantment to drivers within the early days of ride-sharing. Their commercials emphasize the flexibleness and freedom of gig work. Jobless lecturers are proven climbing via the woods, studying books on hammocks, and enjoying sports activities with associates. Their testimonial voiceovers clarify that, although the educational job market has no alternatives, gig work permits them to become profitable whereas remaining of their subject—even when not fairly how they imagined it. “Finding jobs in academia has always been a struggle,” one contractor notes, explaining that he turned to Mercor after his establishment lower off summer time funding. In an commercial for a competing platform, a Stanford-trained chemist expresses hope that working with AI will open future job alternatives, regardless of the in any other case bleak job marketplace for PhD graduates.

As with the ride-hailing business, preliminary guarantees of straightforward cash typically give option to a extra difficult actuality. One doctoral pupil in utilized arithmetic was tasked with fixing tournament-level math issues for roughly $90 per hour. The questions have been difficult, even for somebody together with his experience. Yet the corporate would pay for under two and a half hours of labor per query—and incorrect or incomplete responses acquired no compensation in any respect. This meant he confronted a selection: both proceed engaged on difficult issues free of charge, or hand over and forfeit any fee. Other researchers reported related experiences throughout gig platforms. A latest PhD graduate of an MIT engineering program recalled tabulating all of her unpaid hours for a challenge, solely to appreciate the efficient hourly price was significantly decrease than what had been marketed. “I originally thought that was [a] very fair, generous amount,” she defined, “but then I started keeping track of all the unlogged hours that I wasn’t really paid for and so it ended up not being super worth it.”

Silicon Valley libertarians would possibly reply that that is merely the free market at work. After all, nobody coerced the doctoral college students or underemployed scientists into performing gig work. But this narrative ignores the very direct coverage selections that formed that “free” marketplace for researchers and lecturers. All of the researchers interviewed for this text described turning to gig work as a result of Trump’s federal funding cuts made it a lot tougher to search out alternatives of their subject. The trigger and impact are abundantly clear: The Department of Energy cuts funding so a summer time stipend disappears, or the Trump administration threatens a college and a number of postdoc positions shut. “I would say it’s akin to being farmed,” the doctoral pupil in utilized arithmetic mentioned. He described the advertisements for AI gig work as “clickbaity,” explaining that, as a grad pupil struggling to search out work amid funding cuts, it’s arduous to withstand a job description that touts distant, versatile, asynchronous work at seemingly excessive hourly charges.

As it stands, we more and more depend on the altruism of younger individuals who view science as a calling—however that paradigm could be pushed solely to date earlier than it breaks. Most scientists should not in it for the cash; the identical can’t be mentioned of Silicon Valley. Hence, the 23-year-old founding father of Mercor, Brendan Foody, grew to become a paper billionaire in a matter of months by supplying AI labs with, amongst others, PhD researchers scrambling to stay solvent on their lengthy and more and more arduous profession paths. “The wealthiest companies in the world are willing to spend whatever it takes to improve model capabilities, where Mercor is sitting at the forefront and sort of the primary bottleneck,” Foody explained in a latest interview. In actuality, the people coaching the fashions are the bottleneck—gig platforms, to their credit score, simply discovered the best way to revenue from them.

The fantasy of the free market is usually used to obscure what are in the end worth judgments. Even Peter Thiel’s libertarianism stops wherever Palantir’s pursuits start. Basic science analysis has by no means been significantly worthwhile in its personal proper, however society has benefited enormously from its development. The new cut price struck by Silicon Valley conflates wealth technology with progress. It is akin to deciding {that a} tree’s roots now not have to be watered as a result of the fruit comes solely from its branches. The tech business might endure in the long term, however a number of enterprise capitalists will make extraordinary short-term returns. In the meantime, a technology of scientists dangers getting left behind.

Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara is a doctoral pupil based mostly in New York. He beforehand lined tech coverage for Protocol and Business Insider.

More from The Nation


The EEOC Is No Longer Protecting Federal Workers From Gender Identity Discrimination

Recent selections imply the company will now not course of claims relating to harassment, the denial of loo use, or discrimination in hiring, firing, or promotion on the idea of …

Bryce Covert


OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, the sociopathic poster boy for Silicon Valley's “high agency” revolution.

A profile of an AI healthcare start-up neglected the creaky enterprise mannequin behind it, in addition to the tech sector’s worship of “high agency.”

David Futrelle


The Last Cheap Ride

The collapse of intercity bus service isn’t an accident of the market. It’s the results of treating transportation as a privilege.

Zachary Shell


The Death of an AI Whistleblower

Suchir Balaji sought to show OpenAI’s information abuses. Did it come on the expense of his personal life?

Feature

/

Jacob Silverman


Signage reading “Defend Historic Princeton” across the street from Albert Einstein’s House in Princeton, New Jersey, on March 9, 2026.

What a battle over a mixed-use improvement in a historic city reveals about liberal America.

Sophie Mann-Shafir


An unfurnished dorm room at Yale in New Haven.

Yale simply lower summer time storage reimbursements for first-gen and low-income college students. The college has a $44 billion endowment. What it chooses to finances for says every little thing.

StudentNation

/

Zachary Clifton


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *