Martin Keown defends himself amid accusations of Arsenal bias in fiery Simon Jordan clash

Martin Keown defends himself amid accusations of Arsenal bias in fiery Simon Jordan clash

Martin Keown has hit again at claims he has proven bias in the direction of Arsenal as a pundit this season.

The former defender was accused of a ‘lack of objectivity’ by Simon Jordan on Monday.

Martin Keown live on White & Jordan

4

Keown has defended himself following accusations of displaying bias in the direction of ArsenalCredit: talkSPORT

It adopted Jordan’s feedback following Arsenal’s Champions League final 16 first leg towards Bayer Leverkusen.

The talkSPORT co-host argued Keown was ‘the grand fromage of bias’ for his stance on the Gunners’ late penalty in Germany.

Mikel Arteta’s aspect equalised in the 89th minute after Noni Madueke had received a spot-kick.

Kai Havertz subsequently stepped as much as rating from 12 yards.

Keown, who was half of TNT Sports’ protection of the match, agreed with the referee’s choice to award a penalty.

Speaking after the match, he revealed that he felt Madueke acquired sufficient contact to warrant happening.

Keown responds to bias claims

The former England worldwide joined White & Jordan on Monday and had the accusations put to him.

When given the prospect to reply, he started by asking: “I shouldn’t even be asked that sort of question. Does anyone else have that question?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *